When a personal injury occurs, questions of fault quickly arise. In some cases, the injured person may have contributed to the harm they suffered, by failing to wear proper safety equipment, ignoring clear warnings, or otherwise putting their own safety at risk. This situation is referred to as contributory negligence, and it plays a critical role in personal injury claims across Queensland.
Even if you were partly responsible for your own injuries, you may still be entitled to compensation. However, the amount you receive may be reduced depending on the degree of your own fault. Understanding how contributory negligence works under Queensland’s Civil Liability Act 2003 is essential for protecting your rights.
What is contributory negligence?
Contributory negligence occurs when an injured person’s own actions or omissions contributed to the harm suffered. Under the Civil Liability Act, a plaintiff’s entitlement to compensation can be reduced if the court finds that their conduct fell below the standard of a reasonable person in the same situation.
In Queensland, contributory negligence does not bar a claim entirely. Instead, the court will assess the relevant circumstances and assign a percentage reduction to the damages awarded. For example, if a plaintiff is found to be 30% contributorily negligent, their compensation will be reduced by 30%.
The underlying principle is that everyone owes a duty to take reasonable care for their own safety. If a plaintiff fails to act prudently and suffers harm as a result, the court may conclude that they contributed to the injury sustained.
Common examples of contributory negligence
In negligence cases, contributory negligence can arise in a wide range of everyday scenarios. Some common examples include:
- Failing to wear a seatbelt during a car accident;
- Riding a bicycle without a helmet;
- Not wearing proper safety equipment such as gloves, boots, or helmets at work;
- Ignoring signage or warnings about an obvious risk;
- Texting while walking into traffic;
- Engaging in a dangerous recreational activity without taking appropriate precautions.
In each case, the court examines what a reasonable person would have done and whether the plaintiff failed to exercise reasonable care for their own safety.
How contributory negligence affects your compensation
When plaintiff’s contributory negligence is proven, the damages awarded will be reduced in proportion to their share of responsibility. Queensland courts apply the balance of probabilities test to determine whether the plaintiff’s actions materially contributed to the particular harm.
For example, if a worker suffers a fall on a construction site but was not wearing proper safety equipment, the court may find that the plaintiff contributed to their injuries. If the court decides they were 40% at fault, their compensation will be reduced by 40%.
In civil claims, insurers often argue contributory negligence to minimise their liability. The defendant argued case law is full of disputes over whether the injured person properly cared for their own safety.
Courts consider factors like:
- The nature of the activity engaged in,
- Whether there was an inherent risk,
- Whether the injured person voluntarily assumed the risk,
- What common knowledge would suggest a reasonable person should have done.
How contributory negligence is decided
To establish contributory negligence, the defendant must show that:
- The plaintiff owed a duty to take reasonable care for their own safety,
- The plaintiff failed to do so,
- That failure materially contributed to the harm.
The court assesses the following elements:
- The extent to which the duty of care was breached;
- Whether the risk was an obvious risk;
- The civil liability principles under the Civil Liability Act 2003;
- Whether it was a dangerous recreational activity or an inherent risk.
In some cases, such as dangerous recreational activities engaged in knowingly, the court may even find that the defendant can exclude liability entirely if the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk.
Each case is assessed on its own facts, and the court’s decision depends heavily on the relevant circumstances.
Why you should seek legal advice even if you think you were partly at fault
Many injured people wrongly believe they cannot pursue a personal injury claim if they were partly at fault. In reality, Queensland law recognises that accidents often involve multiple contributing factors.
Even where plaintiff’s contributory negligence is alleged, an experienced lawyer can:
- Minimise the degree of fault assigned to you;
- Challenge the defendant’s evidence;
- Strengthen your case through medical evidence, witness statements, and expert reports;
- Ensure fair compensation for the harm suffered.
A good lawyer understands how to navigate contributory negligence arguments, ensuring that civil liability is properly contested and the injured person is not unfairly penalised for honest mistakes.
How South East Injury Lawyers can help
At South East Injury Lawyers, we have extensive experience helping clients pursue fair compensation – even where contributory negligence is raised. We understand how the Civil Liability Act operates in Queensland and know what it takes to argue for a fair outcome in your case.
If you have suffered harm in a car accident, a workplace incident, or a public place, and you’re concerned that you may have been partly at fault, don’t assume you have no rights. We offer a free initial consultation to assess your situation and explain your options.
Our team is ready to support you through every stage of your legal matter – from gathering evidence, dealing with insurers, and, if necessary, representing you in court to ensure you are treated fairly.
Contact South East Injury Lawyers today and take the first step towards securing the compensation you deserve.
